PACER-Plus Trade in Services and Investment Analysis: Limiting regulatory powers of FIC governments

The chapters on services and investment in the Pacific Agreement on Closer Economic Relations ‘Plus’  (PACER-Plus) show Australia and New Zealand (NZ) have dominated the negotiations to advance their commercial and strategic self-interest, just as they drove the original PACER signed in 2001. Commitments that development would be at the core of PACER-Plus for island countries have never materialised.

apr-Pacer-Plus-Vanuatu.png
The rules on services and investment may appear neutral on their face, but that disguises the reality that Australia and NZ currently dominate both activities in the  Pacific.

For services and investment trade, the Pacific Islands are not an insignificant market for Australia and New Zealand. This must be remembered when assessing the intent behind the outcomes of these chapters and in whose interest they really are.

In 2016 New Zealand sold NZD$278million of services to PACER-Plus countries (excluding Australia) and describes the new commitments made by the Forum Island Countries in Services as “commercially significant” and importantly protected against any future deals the Pacific signs with other nations.

The focus in this paper is on the implications for Forum Islands Country (FIC) governments’ ability to regulate in the national interest.

Download analysis here: PACER-Plus Trade in Services and Investment Analysis: Limiting regulatory powers of FIC governments

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s